Publications
My publications
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-2 abbr"><abbr class="badge">Arxiv</abbr></div>
<!-- Entry bib key -->
<div id="yin2023OWL" class="col-sm-8">
<!-- Title -->
<div class="title">Outlier Weighed Layerwise Sparsity OWL: A Missing Secret Sauce for Pruning LLMs to High Sparsity</div>
<!-- Author -->
<div class="author"><b>Yin, Lu</b>; You, Wu; Zhenyu, Zhang; Cheng-Yu, Hsieh; Yaqing, Wang; Yiling, Jia; Mykola, Pechenizkiy; Yi, Liang; Zhangyang, Wang; and Shiwei, Liu
</div>
<!-- Journal/Book title and date -->
<div class="periodical">
<em>In Arxiv</em> 2023
</div>
<!-- Links/Buttons -->
<div class="links">
<a class="abstract btn btn-sm z-depth-0" role="button">Abs</a>
<a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.05175.pdf" class="btn btn-sm z-depth-0" role="button">HTML</a>
</div>
<!-- Hidden abstract block -->
<div class="abstract hidden">
<p>Large Language Models (LLMs), renowned for their remarkable performance, present a challenge due to their colossal model size when it comes to practical deployment. In response to this challenge, efforts have been directed toward the application of traditional network pruning techniques to LLMs, uncovering a massive number of parameters can be pruned in one-shot without hurting performance. Building upon insights gained from pre-LLM models, prevailing LLM pruning strategies have consistently adhered to the practice of uniformly pruning all layers at equivalent sparsity. However, this observation stands in contrast to the prevailing trends observed in the field of vision models, where non-uniform layerwise sparsity typically yields substantially improved results. To elucidate the underlying reasons for this disparity, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the distribution of token features within LLMs. In doing so, we discover a strong correlation with the emergence of outliers, defined as features exhibiting significantly greater magnitudes compared to their counterparts in feature dimensions. Inspired by this finding, we introduce a novel LLM pruning methodology that incorporates a tailored set of non-uniform layerwise sparsity ratios specifically designed for LLM pruning, termed as Outlier Weighed Layerwise sparsity (OWL). The sparsity ratio of OWL is directly proportional to the outlier ratio observed within each layer, facilitating a more effective alignment between layerwise weight sparsity and outlier ratios. Our empirical evaluation, conducted across the LLaMA-V1 family and OPT, spanning various benchmarks, demonstrates the distinct advantages offered by OWL over previous methods. For instance, our approach exhibits a remarkable performance gain, surpassing the state-of-the-art Wanda and SparseGPT by 61.22 and 6.80 perplexity at a high sparsity level of 70%, respectively. </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ol>
2022
2021
</div>
Data Efficiency and Knowledge Elicitation
2021
- IJCAI (DC)Beyond labels: knowledge elicitation using deep metric learning and psychometric testingIn Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence 2021
2020
–>